jQuery Slider

You are here

"Ohio Five" Bishops Condemn Secret Meetings

"Ohio Five" Bishops Condemn Secret Meetings
The Faith itself is at heart of ECUSA's Drift, they say

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue

August 14, 2004

It's been going on for years. Secret, closed-door meetings, the equivalent of smoke-filled rooms and Tammany Hall styled politics. Latterly it became semi-public small groups where bishops of opposing theologies and morals would face each other and attempt, with deep pain-filled looks, to try and smooth over irreconcilable theological and moral differences. If that didn't work everyone then took Eucharist together - the great Episcopal leveler.

That is how the Episcopal Church House of Bishops has been operating all these years; and always with the hubris of "graceful conversation", "listening", and the new buzzwords of "inclusivity" and "diversity" filling the air, but in the end agreeing with whatever it is the Presiding Bishop thinks the direction the church should go in.

It was always a shell game. The revisionists playing for time, often using local option, while pushing their liberal agenda. The orthodox kept drawing more lines in the sand and the revisionists kept pushing even further. Spong got louder and uglier in his bullying tactics, and the conservatives kept retreating for fear of offending the "moderate middle", hoping that the HOB might not swing radically to the left. It was all horrible self deception and lies.

The abiding issue, in time, became pansexuality, and it would never go away until lesbitransgays were fully and finally brokered into the church. The Presiding Bishop says, and believes, that the jury is still out on the subject of sexuality. It isn't of course, but he wants you to believe that, so now we have a homoerotic bishop running a diocese, and that single act may well unravel the whole communion.

But this week back room politics and "smoke-filled rooms" came to a screeching halt. In an open letter to the Episcopal Church's Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold, five senior bishops (all retired) expressed deep regret that a pattern of secrecy still continues in Episcopal leadership even as the doctrinal crisis in the denomination grows daily.

What they were upset about was this. On March 14 of this year these five senior bishops crossed diocesan lines and confirmed 110 at an unprecedented and historic service in the Diocese of Ohio at a multi-congregational Service of Confirmation and Holy Eucharist representing five Episcopal churches and one Anglican church plant, from various communities in northern Ohio.

This so angered and outraged Ohio Bishop Clark Grew and a number of other revisionist bishops around the country that the cry went up for disciplinary action against these bishops.

A series of letters went back and forth between Bishop Jenkins and the "Ohio Five".

Now, five months later, a meeting planned for August 13, 2004 between the Presiding Bishop's Council of Advice led by Louisiana Bishop Charles Edward Jenkins III and the five bishops was cancelled after the Presiding Bishop refused to allow non-participating observers to attend.

"We feel strongly that a meeting of this importance should not be held in secret," the letter reads. "There is a history of closed door meetings in the House of Bishops. Our distrust of closed meetings on vital issues, as well as our assessment of the gravity of the current crisis in this Church, compelled us to insist that our meeting with your Council of Advice include non-participating observers."

The five bishops including C. Fitz-Simons Allison, Maurice Benitez, William Cox, Alex Dickson and William Wantland know only too well what such a meeting without observers would yield.

At the very minimum a private scolding for breaking the Canons and Constitutions and threats of a public trial for doing same with presentments, inhibitions and more, if they did not apologize and agree to conform. There was no way they were going to do that.

It would have been a lose-lose situation for these orthodox bishops. So they begged off.

There is a certain amount of irony in all this. While Griswold doesn't want anyone listening in to these deliberations, perhaps even to what might amount to a kangaroo-court, the Presiding Bishop has no problems with the coming out of homoerotic bishops, the consecration of a homoerotic bishop, the marriage of a homoerotic bishop and much more - all of which acts are violations of Holy Scripture and 2,000-years of church teaching.

And there is a double irony.

While Griswold and his gang would love to take the high moral ground and tell these bishops what bad bishops they are both privately and then later publicly skewer them; he himself is walking around with a Damaclean sword hanging over his head from a majority of Primates who want him thrown out of the Anglican Communion for his lies and deceptions and public acts of disobedience towards his fellow archbishops. Some 22 Archbishops and bishops have declared themselves in broken communion with Griswold!

There is more hubris in this than NJ Governor Jim McGreevey's public self-revelation of his homosexuality while married.

One bishop had sought advice from this writer as to how best to approach the situation, and it was clear that if they were to meet with the Presiding Bishop's Council of Advice they would have nothing to gain and everything to lose if a third party recording the event was not allowed to be present.

Initially, the bishops had accepted the invitation, welcoming the opportunity to "establish clarity on core issues which are dividing our Church."

"We had hoped for an opportunity at this meeting to discuss the radical departures of the Episcopal Church from the Faith and Practice of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church," they wrote in their letter. "We have tried fervently for many years to have an open and honest discussion in the House of Bishops about these departures from our historic Faith and Practice, but to no avail."

The bishops refused to yield. They said in their letter, "The fact that the Presiding Bishop insisted upon a meeting alone with the Council of Advice (composed solely of bishops) is typical. A small group of bishops also met behind closed doors to produce DEPO (Delegated Episcopal Pastoral Oversight), a fundamentally flawed plan developed with no input from laity or clergy for whom the pastoral care is intended."

Then the bishops turned the tables on the PB and his Council of Advice.

The "Ohio Five" said in their letter that the real issue was the serious "departure from the faith" at the 2003 General Convention when bishops defeated Resolution B001, a measure affirming the historic faith. "It is difficult to understand how bishops could vote against the faith they swore to uphold at their consecration," they said in their letter. "It has been reported that bishops did this for political reasons. If this is true, then this is in pitiful contrast to our predecessors who stood for the Faith, even in the face of death."

Then Bishop Maurice Benitez delivered the coup d'etat for the group. He wrote: "This defeat of B001 was in many ways worse than the two highly publicized decisions on V. Gene Robinson and same sex blessings because it tore away the foundation on which those decisions should have been based. We have abandoned 2000 years of Christian teaching on sexuality, but more importantly we have ignored the authority of Scripture. The result has been chaos in the Episcopal Church - ECUSA has lost large numbers of individuals and congregations, ecumenical relationships have been damaged and the denomination is now in a state of impaired communion with 22 of the 38 Anglican Provinces. The survival of the entire Anglican Communion is at stake," he continued.

The bishops then expressed indignation regarding ECUSA leadership's disproportionate focus on Church Order while ignoring the essential component of Church Faith.

"Many bishops seem more concerned about Canons than about the Faith of the Church," the letter reads. "Many bishops are taking stringent actions to punish clergy and congregations for being loyal to the faith in which they were nurtured for many years. We do certainly believe that Faith and Order are integral parts of one reality. However, the role of Order is to preserve, protect and defend the Faith of the Church, not just the territory and increasingly arbitrary actions of bishops."

The five bishops said they were committed to public clarity on the issues rather than "private dialogue" which has so failed the church.

"We need to acknowledge the reality of what has been wrought by ECUSA's faithlessness," said Bishop Alex Dickson. "Our concern is for those faithful Episcopalians who feel they cannot accept pastoral care from revisionist bishops and priests and feel 'like sheep without a shepherd'. We pray the Primates of the Anglican Communion will discipline ECUSA as well as provide pastoral relief to our Church," he concluded.

The Lambeth Commission is expected to release its report publicly in mid-October, and the Primates of the Anglican Communion are scheduled to meet February 2005 at which time it will be Griswold himself who will be publicly (not privately) reprimanded for his Communion splitting actions, perhaps finding himself forever shunned from the Supreme Council of the Primates.

FOLLOWING IS THE LETTER THE BISHOPS WROTE.

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Friday, August 13, 2004

Dear Bishop Griswold:

We, the undersigned bishops, regret that the meeting we had jointly arranged with the Council of Advice, to take place on 13 August, is not possible due to your refusal to have this be an open meeting with a small number of non-participating observers present. We feel strongly that a meeting of this importance should not be held in secret. There is a history of closed door meetings in the House of Bishops. Our distrust of closed meetings on vital issues, as well as our assessment of the gravity of the current crisis in this Church, compelled us to insist that our meeting with your Council of Advice include non-participating observers. We believe this planned meeting was a significant opportunity to establish clarity on core issues which are dividing our Church. We deeply regret that this meeting now will not take place.

We had hoped for an opportunity at this meeting to discuss the radical departures of the Episcopal Church from the Faith and Practice of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. We have tried fervently for many years to have an open and honest discussion in the House of Bishops about these departures from our historic Faith and Practice, but to no avail.

We regard these departures from the Faith, and their ramifications in the life of this Church we love, to have culminated in the actions of the General Convention of 2003. The most serious departure from the Faith at this recent Convention occurred when the House of Bishops refused to affirm the historic Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral of 1886, 1888, in a motion that was put forward to encourage the faithful members of this Church. We felt that it was imperative that the people of this Church be reassured that we the leaders of the Episcopal Church still believe:

(a) The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, as "containing all things necessary to salvation," and as being the rule and ultimate standard of the faith.

(b) The Apostle's Creed, as the Baptismal Symbol; and the Nicene Creed, as the sufficient statement of the Christian faith.

(c) The two Sacraments ordained by Christ Himself - Baptism and the Supper of the Lord - ministered with unfailing use of Christ's words of institution, and of the elements ordained by Him.

(d) The Historic Episcopate, locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God into the unity of His Church.

(Quoted from pages 877 & 878 of the Book of Common Prayer)

Sadly, this resolution (B001) to affirm this historic statement of our Faith and Practice lost on a vote in the House of Bishops: 84 - No, 65 - Yes, 8 Abstentions. It is difficult to understand how bishops could vote against the faith they swore to uphold at their consecration. It has been reported that bishops did this for political reasons. If this is true, then this is in pitiful contrast to our predecessors who stood for the Faith, even in the face of death.

As a consequence of this action, as well as others at the 2003 Convention, along with other departures from the Faith in recent years, there is confusion and dismay among many faithful Episcopalians. The Episcopal Church has been declared out of Communion or in impaired Communion with the majority of our Anglican family. Thousands of people feel they are "like sheep without a shepherd". Large numbers of clergy, congregations, and individuals have felt compelled by their conscience to leave the Episcopal Church. Still others remain but find themselves unable in good conscience to accept the pastoral care and Episcopal ministry of their diocesan bishops.

And yet, many bishops seem more concerned about Canons than about the Faith of the Church. Many bishops are taking stringent actions to punish clergy and congregations for being loyal to the faith in which they were nurtured for many years. We do certainly believe that Faith and Order are integral parts of one reality. However, the role of Order is to preserve, protect and defend the Faith of the Church, not just the territory and increasingly arbitrary actions of bishops. May the Lord have mercy on us!

We earnestly believe that our Lord Jesus Christ is calling the Episcopal Church to repent for abandoning much of the Faith "once delivered to the saints". We pray that you, as our Presiding Bishop, will lead us all by your own repentance, as called for by most of the Primates of the Anglican Communion, so that this Church will repent and return to the Lord.

Yours in Christ Jesus,

The Rt. Rev. C. FitzSimons Allison
The Rt. Rev. Maurice M. Benitez
The Rt. Rev. William J. Cox
The Rt. Rev. Alex D. Dickson
The Rt. Rev. William C. Wantland

Subscribe
Get a bi-weekly summary of Anglican news from around the world.
comments powered by Disqus
Trinity School for Ministry
Go To Top