jQuery Slider

You are here

Mutual Flourishing? Do the Number of Senior Appointments Support the Five Guiding Principles

Mutual Flourishing? Do the Number of Senior Appointments Support the Five Guiding Principles

By Christopher Pierce, Editor
English Churchman
July 15, 2021

Church Society has issued a statement calling into question the seriousness of the Church of England's hierarchy about its implementation of Five Guiding Principles that were published in 2014.

The Five Guiding Principles were written after the C of E changed canon law to permit the consecration of women to the office of Bishop. They must be assented to by all ordinands. They specifically call for all to mutually flourish with their own convictions regarding the ministry of female clergy.

Chairman of Church Society, The Revd Lee Gatiss, on behalf of Church Society has tallied up the numbers of senior appointments since 2014. It is evident that the reality does not reflect the stated intention of the document.

Since 2014:

67 residentiary canons were appointed including 25 women; 0 traditional catholic; 0 conservative evangelical.
80 archdeacons were appointed including 26 women; 1 traditional catholic; 0 conservative evangelical.
19 deans were appointed including 4 women; 0 traditional catholic; 0 conservative evangelical.
35 suffragan bishops were appointed including 19 women; 1 traditional catholic and 1 conservative evangelical (that is, Bishop Rod Thomas).
12 diocesan bishops were appointed including 5 women; 1 traditional catholic (who has indicated that he will ordain women); 0 conservative evangelical.

The report makes it clear that this situation is not satisfactory. In particular, recommendations 19, 20 and 21 ask for:
"Serious consideration" to be given to the appointment of bishops from the breadth of the church, including conservative evangelicals, as suffragan bishops, especially in larger dioceses with multiple suffragans.

Some suffragan bishops to be appointed to combined posts, where they minister partly in their own diocese, but also have a wider role for their constituency across other dioceses. These posts would be designated for people from specific traditions, including conservative evangelical.

More support and training to ensure that there are appointable candidates from traditions including conservative evangelical.

It should be noted that one of the Implementation and Dialogue Group (IDG), Emma Percy, did not give her support to recommendations 19 and 20, and it is clear throughout that there are many people who remain publicly opposed to the flourishing of conservative evangelicals or catholics in the Church of England.


English Churchman Editorial

Three of Two Hundred Thirteen

By Christopher Pierce, Editor
July 15, 2021

In Lewis Carroll's 1871 novel, Through the Looking Glass, his character, Humpty Dumpty is having a conversation with Alice from Carroll's earlier novel, Alice in Wonderland.

"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,' " Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'

"But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less".

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things".

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's all".

In 2014, the Church of England made a decision to consecrate women to the office of bishop. For many, it was a cause for rejoicing. For others, it was a clear departure from the faith once delivered. In doing so, it developed what are known as the Five Guiding Principles to which all those being ordained must assent and where points 4 and 5 (see next column) say: "the Church of England remains committed to enabling them (those that differ) to flourish within its life and structures; and pastoral and sacramental provision for the minority within the Church of England will be made..."

All that said, one could be forgiven for believing that the Five Guiding Principles are not fully embraced within the hierarchy of the Church. Why? Because in some things, seeing is believing and there isn't much proof the Principles have been internalised. Since 2014, there have been a total of 213 senior positions filled. Only three were from those that opposed the alteration--3 out of 213--a mere 1.4%! Is this the hierarchy's definition of "flourishing"? The reality bites--that for all the insistence on mutual flourishing and forthcoming good disagreement, there's only bare tokenism to show for it. That is disappointing and troubling but it should not cause fear. Jesus is not unaware.

Mutual flourishing, if demonstrated by deed, would mean that there would have been senior appointments that reflect that part of the Church which has not doctrinally changed. As is, one would have to be forgiven for surmising that what is taking place is a real world, real-time re-enactment of Alice's conversation with Humpty Dumpty about the meaning of words. In what world does 1.4% represent flourishing?

There is every reason for the reformed Protestant camp and others to be disturbed by the lack of follow through on promises made. However, they would do well to remember that changes to biblically faithful, received doctrines have been attempted at earlier junctures in the life of the Church. They ultimately failed.


Get a bi-weekly summary of Anglican news from around the world.
comments powered by Disqus
Trinity School for Ministry
Go To Top